References

Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 328 (1990).

Assistive Technology Act of 1998, Pub. L. No. 105-394.

Bowser, G. & Carl, D. F. (2013). AT transitions. OCALI ATIM. www.atinternetmodules.org.

Bridgman, H. J., Harris, A. M., & Rogers, J. (2013). Assistive technology assessment tools. OCALI ATIM. www.atinternetmodules.org.

Bridgman, H. J., Rogers, J., & Staugler, K. (2014). AT for administrators. OCALI ATIM. www.atinternetmodules.org.

Carl, D. (2016). Navigating accessible instructional materials. OCALI ATIM. www.atinternetmodules.org.

Carl, D. F. & Bowser, G. (2013). Assistive technology implementation. OCALI ATIM. www.atinternetmodules.org.

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), 20 U.S.C. § 6301. (2015). https://www.congress.gov/114/plaws/publ95/PLAW-114publ95.pdf

Harris, A. M. (2011). AT assessment process in the school environment. OCALI ATIM www.atinternetmodules.org.

Harris, A. M. (2013). Overview of assistive technology. OCALI ATIM. www.atinternetmodules.org.

Harris, A. M. (2013). AT supports and services in the IEP. OCALI ATIM. www.atinternetmodules.org.

Harris, A. M. (2013). Assistive technology and the IEP process. OCALI ATIM. www.atinternetmodules.org.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1400, 1412(a)(1), 1412(a)(12)(B)(i)) (2004). http://idea.ed.gov/download/statute.html

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA), Sec. 300.172 Access to instructional materials. (2004b). https://sites.ed.gov/idea/regs/b/b/300.172

Ohio Administrative Code 3301-51-01 (OAC), Education of Students with Special Needs. (2014). https://codes.ohio.gov/ohio-administrative-code/rule-3301-51-01

Ohio Department of Education. (2021). Each child means each child: Ohio’s plan to improve learning experiences and outcomes for students with disabilities. https://education.ohio.gov/getattachment/Topics/Special-Education/Improving-Educational-Experiences-and-Outcomes/EachChildMeansEachChild.pdf.aspx?lang=en-US

Ohio Admin. Code § 3301-51-01 (OAC). (2014). https://education.ohio.gov/getattachment/Topics/Special-Education/Federal-and-State-Requirements/Operational-Standards-and-Guidance/Ohio-Administrative-Code-Rules-3301-51-01-to-09-11-and-21.pdf.aspx

Reed, P. (2015). An overview of using the WATI assistive technology assessment process. OCALI ATIM. www.atinternetmodules.org.

Reed, P. (2015). Using the WATI AT assessment process: Funding assistive technology. OCALI ATIM. https://atinternetmodules.org/m/780

Reed, P., Bowser, G, & Korsten, J. (2004). How do you know it? How can you show it? Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative. https://dpi.wi.gov/sites/default/files/imce/sped/pdf/at-know-it-show-it.pdf

Smith, S. J. (2011). AT consideration in the IEP process. OCALI ATIM. www.atinternetmodules.org.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms. ASCD.

Quality Indicators for Assistive Technology Services. (2021). Indicators and matrices. https://qiat.org/indicators/

Quality Indicators for Assistive Technology Services. (2021). Indicator 1. Consideration of AT needs. https://qiat.org/indicators/indicator-1-consideration-of-at-needs/

Quality Indicators for Assistive Technology Services. (2021). Indicator 2. Assessment of assistive technology needs. https://qiat.org/indicators/indicator-2-assessment-of-at-needs/

Quality Indicators for Assistive Technology Services. (2021). Indicator 3: AT in the IEP. https://qiat.org/indicators/indicator-3-at-in-the-iep/

Quality Indicators for Assistive Technology Services. (2021). Indicator 7. Administrative support for AT. https://qiat.org/indicators/indicator-7-administrative-support-for-at/

Zabala, J. (n.d.). Guiding principles for assistive technology and augmentative communication planning and service delivery. Adapted from an early publication of the Arkansas Tech Act Project.